Very long render time of simple grid in hight resolution

   6033   22   2
User Avatar
Member
34 posts
Joined: 9月 2015
Offline
Hi,

I rendered a simple grid with material assigned to it in 3000x3000 px resolution. It took 6 min 37 seconds on my computer with very strong Intel i7 processor and 16 GB RAM. Why does it take so long to render such simple geometry? Am I doing something wrong?

I am affraid to think how much will it take to render complicated scene with millions of polygons or particles 8^(
User Avatar
Member
34 posts
Joined: 9月 2015
Offline
I render the same image in 800x800 resulution in 9 seconds, so it's ok. The difference between this resolution and 3000x3000 render time is huge!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why is it so big?
Edited by mikolaj64 - 2016年5月18日 07:30:36
User Avatar
Member
644 posts
Joined: 6月 2006
Offline

do you have a mantra subdivision active?
hard to tell whats wrong but you can set the verbose to one or two and it will give you some feedback(in the mantra rop).
http://archive.sidefx.com/docs/houdini15.0/props/mantra#statistics [archive.sidefx.com]

whats happening when you use a different material?
User Avatar
Member
459 posts
Joined: 10月 2011
Offline
Do you mind uploading the file? Kinda of hard to tell what makes it take 6 mins. to render. Rendering a simple grid on my MacPro takes 8 sec for 800x800 and 52sec for 3000x3000.

-b
http://www.racecar.no [www.racecar.no]
User Avatar
Member
34 posts
Joined: 9月 2015
Offline
Grid looks like this
Edited by mikolaj64 - 2016年5月18日 11:46:26

Attachments:
marble.jpg (543.8 KB)

User Avatar
Member
459 posts
Joined: 10月 2011
Offline
So this image is applied to the grid as a pixel texture, or is this a procedural shader?
http://www.racecar.no [www.racecar.no]
User Avatar
Member
34 posts
Joined: 9月 2015
Offline
It's a shader
User Avatar
Member
34 posts
Joined: 9月 2015
Offline
OK, I rendered ordinary grey grid in 1000x1000 resolution - render time 6 seconds. Then I did the same in 3000x3000 resolution and the time was 3 minutes. Can anyone advise why the difference in time is so huge? It's only 9 times bigger image and render time is 15 times longer. When there is a shader the difference is even bigger.
User Avatar
Member
333 posts
Joined: 10月 2012
Offline
Maybe try converting it to rat format (iconvert) and see what results you get. Otherwise submit to sidefx support.
User Avatar
Member
4189 posts
Joined: 6月 2012
Offline
Simple grey grid, headlamp light:
1k * 1k takes 1sec
3k * 3k takes 9sec

Same grid with Env light:
1k * 1k takes 1sec
3k * 3k takes 16sec
Edited by anon_user_37409885 - 2016年5月18日 13:48:04
User Avatar
スタッフ
3464 posts
Joined: 7月 2005
Offline
in the attached file I have a grid, a camera, a light and a ROP network with a mantra ROP.

rendering in Render View, Preview OFF, Auto update OFF

render micropolygon:
1000x1000 - 2 sec
3000x3000 - 11 sec

render PBR:
1000x1000 - 4 sec
3000x3000 - 21 sec

with principledShader - diffuse texture

render micropolygon:
1000x1000 - 5 sec
3000x3000 - 28 sec

render PBR:
1000x1000 - 5 sec
3000x3000 - 34 sec

if you're getting very different results please submit an example file to support so we can find out what's up.

thanks

Attachments:
render_res.hip (212.6 KB)

Michael Goldfarb | www.odforce.net
Training Lead
SideFX
www.sidefx.com
User Avatar
Member
1743 posts
Joined: 3月 2012
Offline
If you're rendering in Render View with Preview on, espcially if you have a large number of extra image planes, you may be hitting a known issue where the communication between Mantra and Houdini can become a severe bottleneck. However, if that is what you're hitting, increasing “Update Time” on the IPR toobar from the default of 1 to a larger value, say 10, should probably eliminate the issue, (or you can turn off Preview). It's awfully hard to guess without a HIP file, though.
Writing code for fun and profit since... 2005? Wow, I'm getting old.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_HFmdvpe9U2G3OMNViKMEQ [www.youtube.com]
User Avatar
Member
34 posts
Joined: 9月 2015
Offline
Artye
Simple grey grid, headlamp light:
1k * 1k takes 1sec
3k * 3k takes 9sec

Same grid with Env light:
1k * 1k takes 1sec
3k * 3k takes 16sec


Hello again. I create default grey grid 3k * 3k with default lighting, I turn off “Preview” and “Auto Update” in Render View. Rendering this grid on my computer with Intel i7 3770K and 16 GB RAM takes 1 minute and 6 seconds instead of 9 seconds. Do you think my computer's processor is 7.3 times slower than processor of Artye's computer? I just don't get it.
Edited by mikolaj64 - 2016年9月23日 14:11:38
User Avatar
Member
1743 posts
Joined: 3月 2012
Offline
mikolaj
Hello again. I create default grey grid 3k * 3k with default lighting, I turn off “Preview” and “Auto Update” in Render View. Rendering this grid on my computer with Intel i7 3770K and 16 GB RAM takes 1 minute and 6 seconds instead of 9 seconds. Do you think my computer's processor is 7.3 times slower than processor of Artye's computer? I just don't get it.
Maybe, though that is quite a long time. If I do:

0) Open Houdini
1) Ctrl+Click on the shelf to place a Grid
2) Ctrl+Click to place a camera
3) Change the camera resolution to 3k*3k
4) Click over to Render View
5) Turn off Preview and Auto Update
6) Click Render

It finishes in 19 seconds on my computer in Houdini 15.5.604 on Windows 7, with an Intel Core i7 3960X and 32 GM RAM, (not that it uses anywhere close that much).
Writing code for fun and profit since... 2005? Wow, I'm getting old.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_HFmdvpe9U2G3OMNViKMEQ [www.youtube.com]
User Avatar
Member
34 posts
Joined: 9月 2015
Offline
Yes, I do everything like you have described. I don't know what is going on.

Performance of processors (benchmark Cinebench 11.5):
3960X - 10.5
3770K - 7.5

I think that the difference in render time should not be 3x
Edited by mikolaj64 - 2016年9月23日 15:45:20
User Avatar
スタッフ
3464 posts
Joined: 7月 2005
Offline
did you try the tests in the file I posted?
Michael Goldfarb | www.odforce.net
Training Lead
SideFX
www.sidefx.com
User Avatar
Member
10 posts
Joined: 3月 2014
Offline
Could be your CPU throttling to avoid overheating ? Maybe check your temperatures ?
User Avatar
Member
34 posts
Joined: 9月 2015
Offline
OK, sorry. I was doing it a little bit different. I was placing camera directly above the grid and filling frame with the grid.

Now it takes only 35 seconds because grid does not fill the frame.
Edited by mikolaj64 - 2016年9月23日 16:26:40
User Avatar
Member
34 posts
Joined: 9月 2015
Offline
arctor
did you try the tests in the file I posted?

Hello, yes I have checked it. Here are my results:

render micropolygon:
1000x1000 - 3 sec (your time 2)
3000x3000 - 21 sec (your time 11)

render PBR:
1000x1000 - 8 sec (your time 4)
3000x3000 - 1 min 3 sec (your time 21)


with principledShader - diffuse texture

render micropolygon:
1000x1000 - 7 sec (your time 5)
3000x3000 - 51 sec (your time 28)

render PBR:
1000x1000 - 12 sec (your time 5)
3000x3000 - 1 min 40 sec (your time 34)
Edited by mikolaj64 - 2016年9月23日 17:24:50
User Avatar
Member
45 posts
Joined: 8月 2012
Offline
mikolaj, over the years, with the renderer Mantra, I can say, that this is normal. Sometimes it works quickly, sometimes not! Raytrace in some tasks slow, Micropoligon running faster all, and if we talk about the PBR, it is also not the fastest. However, often Mantra can handle huge amounts of data without disruption, which gives it a leading quality. Maybe, someday, users will get more faster performance Manta and implementation of GPU rendering. Currently, developers make improvements. When there is improvement - it's good.
  • Quick Links