Procedural Tubes
30830 20 3
-
- MagnusL3D
- Member
- 1110 posts
- Joined: Aug. 2008
- Offline
-
- MagnusL3D
- Member
- 1110 posts
- Joined: Aug. 2008
- Offline
-
- pclaes
- Member
- 257 posts
- Joined: Nov. 2007
- Offline
looks cool! Can't tell if they are interpenetrating or not, so I guess it's fine 
.
.
Cg Supervisor | Effects Supervisor | Expert Technical Artist at Infinity Ward
https://www.linkedin.com/in/peter-claes-10a4854/ [www.linkedin.com]
https://www.linkedin.com/in/peter-claes-10a4854/ [www.linkedin.com]
-
- roughsporty
- Member
- 191 posts
- Joined: Aug. 2008
- Offline
-
- MagnusL3D
- Member
- 1110 posts
- Joined: Aug. 2008
- Offline
pclaes, Thanks ! Well actually there might be interpenetrating since the “lift” factor was random, but I have no improved it so it takes previous layer hight + radius, only downside to that is that they became alot thicker, so I put in a multipler factor because you dont realy see intterpenetration that much as long as it's somewhat above …*phew*
roughsporty, Thanks ! what impressed me the most is the render times I get with Mantra, last pic was renderd under 5min..and since then I've improved quality and render times are still very good ..so making a little movie clip
Well actually there might be interpenetrating since the “lift” factor was random, but I have no improved it so it takes previous layer hight + radius, only downside to that is that they became alot thicker, so I put in a multipler factor because you dont realy see intterpenetration that much as long as it's somewhat above …*phew* roughsporty, Thanks ! what impressed me the most is the render times I get with Mantra, last pic was renderd under 5min..and since then I've improved quality and render times are still very good
..so making a little movie clip
-
- Lu-Tze
- Member
- 15 posts
- Joined: Feb. 2009
- Offline
-
- zarti
- Member
- 330 posts
- Joined: July 2007
- Offline
-
- barriallen
- Member
- 13 posts
- Joined: March 2009
- Offline
-
- MagnusL3D
- Member
- 1110 posts
- Joined: Aug. 2008
- Offline
Thanks guy's ! I have put togeather a sample file, It should generate something that looks like the attached picture.
File was saved with 11.0.573
the sample file is a earlier version before I added more complexity and safe guards so it should be pretty straight forward ! except for my strange naming convention
It can be easily rebuild to use drawn curves to become the child pipes to, but I went for generating that too, meaning I can copystamp and get different pipes
File was saved with 11.0.573
the sample file is a earlier version before I added more complexity and safe guards so it should be pretty straight forward ! except for my strange naming convention
It can be easily rebuild to use drawn curves to become the child pipes to, but I went for generating that too, meaning I can copystamp and get different pipes
-
- Lu-Tze
- Member
- 15 posts
- Joined: Feb. 2009
- Offline
-
- MagnusL3D
- Member
- 1110 posts
- Joined: Aug. 2008
- Offline
Lu-Tze, dont hesitate to ask if something is unclear !
And here is the promised video render!
http://vimeo.com/17858177 [vimeo.com]
And here is the promised video render!
http://vimeo.com/17858177 [vimeo.com]
-
- Mirco_Paolini_VFX
- Member
- 23 posts
- Joined: Nov. 2010
- Offline
-
- barriallen
- Member
- 13 posts
- Joined: March 2009
- Offline
-
- Natasha666
- Member
- 1 posts
- Joined: Feb. 2011
- Offline
-
- vyudin
- Member
- 77 posts
- Joined: April 2009
- Offline
-
- cellchuk
- Member
- 38 posts
- Joined: June 2006
- Offline
-
- Sadjad Rabiee
- Member
- 1391 posts
- Joined: Dec. 2010
- Offline
-
- tinyparticle
- Member
- 175 posts
- Joined: Sept. 2014
- Offline
-
- D3K17
- Member
- 2 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2014
- Offline
-
- Pavel Geraskin
- Member
- 93 posts
- Joined: March 2014
- Offline
-
- Quick Links