The latest daily build has:
Re-enable a second code optimization for Karma on Windows now that the MSVC compiler bug has been fixed that required disabling optimizations.
is that related to the issue and should the rendertimes on linux vs win be now more at the same ballpark?
XPU tests (with sample scene)
36895 93 6
-
- frostfx
- Member
- 44 posts
- Joined: May 2017
- Offline
-
- GCharb
- Member
- 279 posts
- Joined: June 2016
- Offline
frostfxSomeone will have to install the latest build and render the scene, so we can find out!
The latest daily build has:
Re-enable a second code optimization for Karma on Windows now that the MSVC compiler bug has been fixed that required disabling optimizations.
is that related to the issue and should the rendertimes on linux vs win be now more at the same ballpark?
-
- chrism
- Staff
- 2544 posts
- Joined: Sept. 2007
- Offline
-
- PaQ WaK
- Member
- 100 posts
- Joined: Jan. 2015
- Offline
-
- TwinSnakes007
- Member
- 640 posts
- Joined: July 2013
- Offline
-
- GCharb
- Member
- 279 posts
- Joined: June 2016
- Offline
-
- Andy_23
- Member
- 918 posts
- Joined: March 2014
- Offline
-
- Siavash Tehrani
- Member
- 729 posts
- Joined: July 2005
- Offline
-
- GCharb
- Member
- 279 posts
- Joined: June 2016
- Offline
-
- 3156632469
- Member
- 1 posts
- Joined: Sept. 2021
- Offline
-
- brians
- Staff
- 530 posts
- Joined: May 2019
- Offline
GCharb
It looks like there is quite a bit of a speed gain in 449 compared to 383 with XPU using my GTX 1650, at least under Linux, great work SideFX.
383: 9:34
449: 7:13
Hi
A quick question, when you have XPU enabled in the viewport, what devices are displayed (top right corner) and what percentage balance between EmbreeCPU and Opitx do you typically get?
thanks!
Edited by brians - Dec. 3, 2021 18:23:26
-
- GCharb
- Member
- 279 posts
- Joined: June 2016
- Offline
-
- HM_2020
- Member
- 43 posts
- Joined: Aug. 2013
- Offline
-
- GCharb
- Member
- 279 posts
- Joined: June 2016
- Offline
-
- Quick Links