If I am using the same scene elements, is the performance under the hood identical between an Object network LOPNET vs a Solaris stage?
Thanks
T
LOPNET vs Solaris Stage?
1199 4 1- Terence Ziegler
- Member
- 64 posts
- Joined: Nov. 2015
- Offline
- jparker
- Member
- 317 posts
- Joined:
- Offline
- tamte
- Member
- 8845 posts
- Joined: July 2007
- Offline
yes, should be the same
/stage is just an oldschool type of context location under the / root
while you can use those, they feel a bit inconsistent and in my opinion using /stage, /mat, /rop, ... just makes it more difficult to port the setups or wrap them under a single subnet in the future
however it's just that, a location, so whether you place your LOPs directly under /stage or inside of any LOPnet node it should not affect the performance of the network
/stage is just an oldschool type of context location under the / root
while you can use those, they feel a bit inconsistent and in my opinion using /stage, /mat, /rop, ... just makes it more difficult to port the setups or wrap them under a single subnet in the future
however it's just that, a location, so whether you place your LOPs directly under /stage or inside of any LOPnet node it should not affect the performance of the network
Tomas Slancik
FX Supervisor
Method Studios, NY
FX Supervisor
Method Studios, NY
- jerry7
- Member
- 653 posts
- Joined: Nov. 2013
- Offline
- jparker
- Member
- 317 posts
- Joined:
- Offline
For legacy reasons there are some differences in how the root is handled and also how different network types are handled. For example you still need a separate topnet in the /tasks context, but not a separate ropnet in the /out context.
Slightly annoying in an OCD way but I would be surprised if this changes any time soon.
Slightly annoying in an OCD way but I would be surprised if this changes any time soon.
-
- Quick Links