Official Labs Vertex Animation Textures 3.0 FAQs and Links

   59093   87   32
User Avatar
Member
44 posts
Joined:
Offline
I am having trouble getting VAT to work with PDG, it is all set up correctly but exr files that come out are correct size and all but they are all black. Pressing render button no VAT node however produces expected results. Am I missing something or is it a bug ?

PDG network is dead simple, it reads fbx animations from a folder, brings them to sops, does stuff and renders them out.
Edited by kumpa - Feb. 9, 2024 04:22:55
User Avatar
Member
4 posts
Joined: Aug. 2015
Offline
Hello,
Does anyone know how to export particles with the ID attribute? It looks like the VAT exporter ignores this attribute, although it is there.
Edited by kripto289 - July 10, 2024 22:39:46

Attachments:
ID_issue.jpg (581.5 KB)

User Avatar
Member
1 posts
Joined: Aug. 2024
Offline
I am currently trying to implement VAT3.0 on in-house engine.

Where can I find reference implementation of VAT 3.0 in HLSL like this?
https://github.com/sideeffects/GameDevelopmentToolset/blob/Houdini16.0/unity/shaders/vertex_soft_body.shader [github.com]

I mean, I'd like to avoid porting node graphs to code.

Thank you.
User Avatar
Member
2 posts
Joined: July 2021
Offline
Similarly to some others in this thread, I've been having issues exporting sequences to Unity that appear related to the size of the sequence and its components. I've not yet worked out much beyond scaling the simulation down at the end to some arbitrary value (it's been different between tests) seems to "fix" it.

Simple test sequence in Houdini:


Exported to Unreal:


Exported to Unity:


In this specific example, if I scale the bowl down to below 15 for the radius, it works (in the video, it's set to 50). I've also tried other things, like scaling down globally at the end, followed by the assemble, which works. Insights appreciated!
Edited by timmeh - Oct. 2, 2024 12:28:49
User Avatar
Member
111 posts
Joined: Feb. 2019
Offline
MaiAo
I will be working on a more permanent solution to spatially and temporally stabilize the normals for this kind of animations. The solution will probably be released as a standalone SOP that stabilizes your geometry before it is sent to VAT ROP

Is this problem solved?
User Avatar
Member
1 posts
Joined: Oct. 2024
Offline
Hi everyone,

I'm working on a project involving volumetric fluid effects similar to this asset: Volumetric Blood Fluids [assetstore.unity.com], where the author mentions 3 to 6k triangles while still achieving good results, and I'm trying to create something cheap in Houdini that can still work well in real-time.

I've tried using the Dynamic Remeshing (Fluid) VAT setup from Labs, but I noticed that it ends up consuming quite a lot in terms of polycount. My current mesh has about 30K vertices and 10K triangles at 60 fps, along with the VAT textures for position, rotation, and lookup. While this works, it feels a bit heavy for what I'm aiming for in terms of real-time performance.

I'm curious if anyone has managed to create volumetric-style fluid effects in Houdini with a more optimized approach that reduces the polycount or the resource cost overall? Are there alternative methods or optimizations for VAT that you use to keep it lightweight but still visually appealing?

Any advice or examples of setups that worked well for you would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks in advance!
User Avatar
Member
8 posts
Joined: Feb. 2015
Online
Damien_dl
Hi everyone,

I'm working on a project involving volumetric fluid effects similar to this asset: Volumetric Blood Fluids [assetstore.unity.com], where the author mentions 3 to 6k triangles while still achieving good results, and I'm trying to create something cheap in Houdini that can still work well in real-time.

I've tried using the Dynamic Remeshing (Fluid) VAT setup from Labs, but I noticed that it ends up consuming quite a lot in terms of polycount. My current mesh has about 30K vertices and 10K triangles at 60 fps, along with the VAT textures for position, rotation, and lookup. While this works, it feels a bit heavy for what I'm aiming for in terms of real-time performance.

I'm curious if anyone has managed to create volumetric-style fluid effects in Houdini with a more optimized approach that reduces the polycount or the resource cost overall? Are there alternative methods or optimizations for VAT that you use to keep it lightweight but still visually appealing?

Any advice or examples of setups that worked well for you would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks in advance!


I actually made a tutorial on this topic for Unity. It might give you some of the answers you're looking for, here it is.

Hope it helps, and good luck with your setup!
/TechHamlin

User Avatar
Member
35 posts
Joined: Nov. 2012
Offline
Have anyone had luck with making VAT work with tangent-space normals, like the normals of the specific texture sets? Setup requirement is to use world-space normals. I want to use VATs material functions in Unreal Engine as an intermadiary which can be turned on with a static switch on a parent material, so that my child materials can use it, if they need. But of course, as is the standard, most of my materials use tangent space normals, for instance megascan surfaces. If this is not possible, this limits the usability a great deal.
Artur Mandas

Artist & Developer
http://arturmandas.com [arturmandas.com]
  • Quick Links